p-books.com
Some Diversions of a Man of Letters
by Edmund William Gosse
Previous Part     1  2  3  4  5  6  7
Home - Random Browse

These are errors in discretion. A fault in art is the want of care which the author takes in delineating his minor or subordinate figures. He gives remarkable pains, for example, to his study of General Gordon, but he is indifferent to accuracy in his sketches of the persons who came into contact, and often into collision, with Gordon. In this he resembles those French painters, such as Bastien Lepage, who focus their eye on one portion of their canvas, and work that up to a high perfection, while leaving the rest of the picture misty and vague. Even in that case the subordinate figures, if subdued in fogginess, should not be falsely drawn, but Mr. Strachey, intent upon the violent portrait of Gordon, is willing to leave his Baring and Hartington and Wolseley inexact as well as shadowy. The essay on General Gordon, indeed, is the least successful of the four monographs. Dexterous as he is, Mr. Strachey has not had the material to work upon which now exists to elucidate his other and earlier subjects. But it is difficult to account for his apparently not having read Mr. Bernard Holland's life of the Duke of Devonshire, which throws much light, evidently unknown to Mr. Strachey, on the Gordon relief expedition. He ought to know that Sir Evelyn Baring urged the expedition, while Chamberlain was one of its opponents. Mr. Strachey does not seem to have noticed how much the issue was confused by conflicting opinions as to whether the route to be taken should be by Suakin or up the Nile.

No part of his book is more vigorous or picturesque than the chapter dealing with the proclamation of Papal Infallibility. But here again one is annoyed by the glibness with which Mr. Strachey smoothly asserts what are only his conjectures.

In his account of Manning's reception in Rome—and this is of central importance in his picture of Manning's whole career—he exaggerates the personal policy of Pio Nono, whom he represents as more independent of the staff of the Curia than was possible. Rome has never acknowledged the right of the individual, even though that individual be the Pope, to an independent authority. Mr. Odo Russell was resident secretary in Rome from 1858 to 1870, and his period of office was drawing to a close when Manning arrived; he was shortly afterwards removed to become Assistant Under Secretary of State at our Foreign Office. The author of Eminent Victorians is pleased to describe "poor Mr. Russell" as little better than a fly buzzing in Manning's "spider's web of delicate and clinging diplomacy." It is not in the memory of those who were behind the scenes that Odo Russell was such a cipher. Though suave in address, he was by no means deficient in decision or force of character, as was evidenced when, some months later, he explained to Mr. Gladstone his reasons for stating to Bismarck, without instructions from the government, that the Black Sea question was one on which Great Britain might be compelled to go to war with or without allies. Lord Morley's Life of Gladstone (vol. ii., p. 354) is explicit on this interesting point. The information which, by special permission of the Pope, Cardinal Manning was able to give to him on all that was going on in the Council was, of course, of great value to Odo Russell, but his views on other aspects of the question were derived from quite different sources.

In this respect he had the advantage of the Cardinal, both on account of his diplomatic position and of his long and intimate knowledge both of Vatican policy and of the forces which the Curia has at its command. On the strength of those forces, and on the small amount of effective support which British opposition to the Decree of Infallibility was likely to receive from the Catholic Powers, he no doubt held strong opinions. Some years later he did not conceal his conviction that Prince Bismarck would be worsted in his conflict with Rome on the Education Laws, and the event proved his forecast to be perfectly correct. This is an example of the dangers which beset a too glib and superficial treatment of political events which were conducted in secret, and with every circumstance of mystery.

Several of the characteristics which diversify Mr. Strachey's remarkable volume are exemplified in the following quotation. It deals with the funeral of Cardinal Manning:—

"The route of the procession was lined by vast crowds of working people, whose imaginations, in some instinctive manner, had been touched. Many who had hardly seen him declared that in Cardinal Manning they had lost their best friend. Was it the magnetic vigour of the dead man's spirit that moved them? Or was it his valiant disregard of common custom and those conventional reserves and poor punctilios, which are wont to hem about the great? Or was it something untameable in his glances and in his gestures? Or was it, perhaps, the mysterious glamour lingering about him of the antique organisation of Rome? For whatever cause, the mind of the people had been impressed; and yet, after all, the impression was more acute than lasting. The Cardinal's memory is a dim thing to-day. And he who descends into the crypt of that Cathedral which Manning never lived to see, will observe, in the quiet niche with the sepulchral monument, that the dust lies thick on the strange, the incongruous, the almost impossible object which, with its elaborations of dependent tassels, hangs down from the dim vault like some forlorn and forgotten trophy, the Hat."

Longinus tells us that "a just judgment of style is the final fruit of long experience." In the measured utterances of Mr. Asquith we recognise the speech of a man to whom all that is old and good is familiar, and in whom the art of finished expression has become a habit. No more elegantly balanced, no more delicately perceptive mind than his has appeared of recent times in our midst, and there is something in the equipoise of his own genius which points Mr. Asquith out as a judge peculiarly well fitted to sit in judgment upon rival ages. In his Romanes lecture there was but one thing to be regretted: the restricted space which it offered for the full expansion of the theme. Mr. Asquith excels in swift and rapid flights, but even for him the Victorian Age is too broad a province to be explored within one hour. He endeavoured to lighten his task by excluding theology and politics, and indeed but for such self-denial he could scarcely have moved at all in so dense an air. He was able, however, having thrown out so much formidable ballast, to rise above his subject, and gazing at the Victorian Age, as it recedes, he declared it to have been very good. The young men who despise and attack that Age receive no support in any particular from Mr. Asquith.

He dwells on the fecundity of the literature of the Victorian Age in its middle period, and especially on the publications which adorned the decade from 1850 to 1859. He calls those years, very justly, "marvellous and almost unexampled" in their rich profusion. I may suggest that the only rival to them in our history is the period from 1590 to 1600, which saw the early plays of Shakespeare, the Faerie Queene, the Arcadia, the Ecclesiastical Polity, Tamburlaine, The Discovery of Guiana, and Bacon's Essays. If the works catalogued by Mr. Asquith do not equal these in intensity, they excel them by the breadth of the ground they cover, extending from Browning to Darwin and from Thackeray to Ruskin. Moreover, the Oxford list might have included Lavengro and Newman's Lectures, and Herbert Spencer's Social Statics. The only third decade worthy to be named with those of 1590 and 1850 is that which opens in 1705, and is illuminated by the names of Pope, Shaftesbury, Swift, Arbuthnot, Defoe, Steele, Addison, and Berkeley. It is pleasant to compare these three magnificently flowering epochs, but not profitable if we attempt to weigh one against the other. They are comparable only in the splendour of their accomplishment.

It is more difficult to fit science into our scheme of the Victorian Age than to find places there for Art and Literature. Perhaps the reason of this is that the latter were national in their character, whereas scientific inquiry, throughout the nineteenth century, was carried on upon international lines, or, at least, in a spirit unprecedentedly non-provincial. The vast achievements of science, practical and theoretical, were produced for the world, not for a race. Mr. Asquith speaks with justice and eloquence of the appearance of Darwin's Origin of Species which he distinguishes as being "if not actually the most important, certainly the most interesting event of the Age," and his remarks on the fortune of that book are excellent. No one can over-estimate the value of what we owe to Darwin. But perhaps a Frenchman might speak in almost the same terms of Claude Bernard, whose life and work ran parallel with Darwin's. If the Origin of Species made an epoch in 1859, the Introduction a la medicine experimental made another in 1865. Both these books, as channels by which the experimental labours of each investigator reached the prepared and instructed public, exercised at once, and have continued ever since to exercise, an enormous effect on thought as well as on knowledge. They transformed the methods by which man approaches scientific investigation, and while they instructed they stimulated a new ardour for instruction. In each case the value of the discovery lay in the value of the idea which led to the discovery, and, as some one has said in the case of Claude Bernard, they combined for the first time the operations of science and philosophy. The parallel between these two contemporaries extends, in a measure, to their disciples and successors, and seems to suggest that Mr. Asquith in his generous and difficult estimate may have exaggerated the purely Victorian element in the science of the age of Darwin. This only accentuates the difficulty, and he may perhaps retort that there is an extreme danger in suggesting what does and what does not form a part of so huge a system.

Justifiably Mr. Asquith takes it for granted that the performance of the central years of the Victorian Age was splendid. With those who deny merit to the writers and artists of the last half century it is difficult to reach a common ground for argument. What is to be the criterion of taste if all the multiform exhibitions of it which passed muster from 1840 to 1890 are now to be swept away with contumely? Perhaps indeed it is only among those extravagant romanticists who are trying to raise entirely new ideals, unrelated to any existing forms of art and literature, that we find a denial of all merit to the Victorian masters. Against this caricature of criticism, this Bolshevism, it would be hopeless to contend. But there is a large and growing class of more moderate thinkers who hold, in the first place, that the merit of the leading Victorian writers has been persistently over-estimated, and that since its culmination the Victorian spirit has not ceased to decay, arriving at length at the state of timidity and repetition which encourages what is ugly, narrow, and vulgar, and demands nothing better than a swift dismissal to the dust-bin.

Every stratum of society, particularly if it is at all sophisticated, contains a body of barbarians who are usually silent from lack of occasion to express themselves, but who are always ready to seize an opportunity to suppress a movement of idealism. We accustom ourselves to the idea that certain broad principles of taste are universally accepted, and our respectable newspapers foster this benevolent delusion by talking habitually "over the heads," as we say, of the majority of their readers. They make "great music for a little clan," and nothing can be more praiseworthy than their effort, but, as a matter of fact, with or without the aid of the newspapers, the people who really care for literature or art, or for strenuous mental exercise of any kind, are relatively few. If we could procure a completely confidential statement of the number of persons to whom the names of Charles Lamb and Gainsborough have a distinct meaning, and still more of those who can summon up an impression of the essays of the one and of the pictures of the other, we should in all probability be painfully startled. Yet since these names enjoy what we call a universal celebrity, what must be the popular relation to figures much less prominent?

The result of this tyranny of fame, for so it must appear to all those who are inconvenienced by the expression of it, is to rouse a sullen tendency to attack the figures of art and literature whenever there arrives a chance of doing that successfully. Popular audiences can always be depended upon to cheer the statement of "a plain man" that he is not "clever" enough to understand Browning or Meredith. An assurance that life is too short to be troubled with Henry James wakes the lower middle class to ecstasy. An opportunity for such protests is provided by our English lack of critical tradition, by our accepted habit of saying, "I do hate" or "I must say I rather like" this or that without reference to any species of authority. This seems to have grown with dangerous rapidity of late years. It was not tolerated among the Victorians, who carried admiration to the highest pitch. They marshalled it, they defined it, they turned it from a virtue into a religion, and called it Hero Worship. Even their abuse was a kind of admiration turned inside out, as in Swinburne's diatribes against Carlyle, who himself fought against the theory of Darwin, not philosophically, but as though it were a personal insult to himself. Such violence of taste is now gone out of fashion; every scribbler and dauber likes to believe himself on a level with the best, and the positive criterion of value which sincere admiration gave is lost to us. Hence the success of Mr. Lytton Strachey.

But the decline of ardour does not explain the whole position, which we have to face with firmness. Epochs come to an end, and before they have their place finally awarded to them in history they are bound to endure much vicissitude of fortune. No amount of sarcasm or of indignant protest will avail to conceal the fact that we stand to-day at the porch, that much more probably we have already penetrated far into the vestibule, of a new age. What its character will be, or what its principal products, it is absolutely impossible for us as yet to conjecture. Meanwhile the Victorian Age recedes, and it loses size and lustre as we get further and further away from it. When what was called "Symbolism" began to act in urgent and direct reaction to the aims of those still in authority, the old order received its notice to quit, but that was at least five and twenty years ago, and the change is not complete. Ages so multiform and redundant and full of blood as the Victorian take a long time to die; they have their surprising recoveries and their uncovenanted convalescences. But even they give up the ghost at length, and are buried hastily with scant reverence. The time has doubtless come when aged mourners must prepare themselves to attend the obsequies of the Victorian Age with as much decency as they can muster.

1918.



INDEX

Abbaye de Creteil, 303-4 Acton, Lord, 328 Addison, J., relation of, to Romanticists, 70-1; 68, 76, 82 Agnes de Castro, by Catharine Trotter, 43-5 Akenside, 74 Allard-Meeus, J., 273 Alroy, by B. Disraeli, 161 American criticism, and Edgar Allan Poe, 104, 105 Anne, Queen, 58 Annabel Lee, by E.A. Poe, 103, 112 Argyll, Duke of, 320 Ariosto, 84, 85 Arnauld, Angelique, 39 Arnold, M., 3, 68, 71, 133, 267 Arnold, Dr. T., Mr. Strachey's portrait of, 326-7 Asquith, Mr., Romanes lecture of, 332-5

Bacon, 17 Bagehot, W., 96 Balfour, A.J., re standards of taste, 4, 5, 10 Ballenden, Sarah, 40 Baring, M., poems of, 265, 273-5 Barrie, Sir J., 100 Barry, Mrs., 57 Batsford, Lord Redesdale at, 217-8, 222, 224-8, 229 Baudelaire, 106 Bayle, 59 Behn, Aphra, 39 Bell, T., of Selborne, 182 Berkeley, 98 Betterton, 48, 57 Birch, Rev. Dr., 61 Blake, W., 5, 90 Blessington, Lady, 131 Boileau, 70, 77, 82 Booth, 57 Bottomley, G., 262 Bridges, R., War poetry of, 161; 110 de Brillac, Mlle., 44 Bronte, Charlotte, dislike of Dewsbury, 142-3; message of, arose from pain and resistance, 144; her unhappiness, its causes, 145-6; defiance the note of her writings, 146-50 Bronte, Emily, 149 Brontes, The Challenge of the, address delivered on, 141-50; their connexion with Dewsbury, 141-2 Brooke, Rupert, poems of, 268-70 Browning, R., 9, 81, 132 Brunetiere, 7 Bruxambille, 95 Bryant, 107, 108 Bulwer-Lytton, E., ambiguity of his position in literature, 117; R. Lytton's biography, 118, 121; Lord Lytton's biography, 117, 118-9, 120, 122, 129, 130, 131, 133, 137; autobiography, 119-20; story of matrimonial troubles, 121-9; character, 129-30; acquaintances and friends, 130-2; relations with contemporary writers and poets, 132-4; stormy life, 134; unfavourable attitude of critics towards, 134-5; popularity of his writings, 135-6; versatility and merits, 136-7; 178 Bulwer-Lytton, Mrs., opposition to Bulwer-Lytton's marriage, 124-7 Burghclere, Lady, open letter to, on Lady D. Nevill, 181-96 Burnet, George, 52, 53, 54, 55, 58, 59, 60 Burnet, Gilbert, Bishop, patron of the Trotters, 41, 52, 53 Burnet, Mrs., 52, 53 Burney, Dr., 33 Burton, 96 Byron, 76, 104, 108, 148, 161-2

Carlyle, 100 Carlyle, Mrs., her opinion of Keats, 9 Catullus, 84 Charles II, 40, 41 Chateaubriand, 74 Chatterton, 87 Cibber, Colley, 44 Classic poetry, Romanticists' revolt against principles of, 70-90 Clough, A.H., 325, 328 Cockburn, Mr., 60, 61 Coleridge, 104, 108, 274 Collier, Jeremy, attack on stage immorality, 47 Collins, 86, 110 Colonisation, England's debt to Walter Raleigh, 24-5 Congreve, Catherine Trotter's relations with, 43, 47, 48, 50; 57, 58 Coningsby, by B. Disraeli, 153, 164, 165-6, 169, 170-2, 173 Contarini Fleming, by B. Disraeli, 159-61, 162 Corbett, N.M.F., poems of, 275 Cowes in war time, 219-21 Cowley, 82 Cowper, 253 Crabbe, G., Hardy compared with, 248 Cranch, C.P., 105 Cromer, Lord, essay on, 196-216; intellectual and literary activity, 197-8; as a speaker, 198-200; interest in House of Lords Library, 200; classical tastes, 200-203; conversation, attitude to life and letters, 204-8; correspondence and reflections, 208-10; humour, 210-12; verse, 212-15; literary activities, 215-16

Dacier, Mme., 52 Dacre, by Countess of Morley, 153, 156 Dante, 225-6 Dartmouth, George, Earl of, 40, 42 D'Aubigne, 78 Daudet, A., 252 Daudet, E., 229-30 Davies, W.H., 262 De Vere, Mrs., 59 Devey, Miss, "Life of Rosina, Lady Lytton," by, 121 Dewsbury, the Brontes' connexion with, 141-2 Dickens, C, 100, 128, 131 Disraeli, B., novels of, address, 153-78; not taken seriously as an author, 153-4; three periods of writing, 154-5; contemporary fiction, 155-6; Vivian Grey, 156-9; The Young Duke, 157; Henrietta Temple, 159; Contarini Fleming, 159-60; Byron's influence on, 161; Voltaire's influence on, 162; fascinated by Venice, 163; Venetia, 163; Parliamentary experience and literary results, 164; Coningsby, 165-6; Sybil, 167-8; Tancred, 169-72; Prime Minister, 172; Lothair, 173-8; 131, 135 Donne, J., 78, 111, 236, 244, 252 Dorset, Charles, Earl of, 43 Dowden, 34 Doyle, Sir A.C., 103 Dryden, 34, 49, 50, 70, 82, 274 Du Bos, Abbe, 90 Durham, Lord, 131 Dyer, 70

Elizabeth, Queen, sympathy between Raleigh and, 18 Eloisa to Abelard, by Pope, its appeal to Romanticists, 83-4 Emerson, 107 Eminent Victorians, by Lytton Strachey, review of, 318-32 English Poetry, The Future of, 289-309; instances of national lapses in poetic output, 290; necessity of novelty of expression and difficulties arising, 291-2; advantages of vernacular poetry, 293; future poetry bound to dispense with obvious description and reflection and to take on greater subtlety of expression, 294-7; Wordsworth's speculations concerning nineteenth-century poetry, 298-9; prospect of social poetry, 299-301; "effusion of natural sensibility" more probable, 302-3; French experiments, 303-4; as to disappearance of erotic poetry, 305-6; dramatic poetry and symbolism, 306-9 Essay on Criticism, by Pope, Romanticists' attack upon, 71-4 Essay on Genius of Pope, by J. Warton, 80-3

Farquhar, 48 Fatal Friendship, by C. Trotter, 47-8 Fawcett, Rev. J., 97 Fenn, Mr., 60 Fletcher, John, songs of, 35 For Annie, by E.A. Poe, 112 Ford, songs of, 35 Forster, John, 131-2, 133 France, Anatole, 7

Gaskell, Mrs., 141 Gautier, T., 6, 10 Genoa, Duke of, 133 Georgian poetry, its pre-war characteristics, 261-2 Gibbon, 98 Gibson, W.W., 262 Gilbert, Sir H., 25 Gilpin, 87 Godolphin, Henrietta, 58 Goethe, 161 de Goncourt, E., 252 Gongora, 78 Gordon, General, 15; Mr. Strachey's portrait of, 329-30 Gore, Mrs., 178 de Gourmont, Remy, his opinion of Sully-Prudhomme, 9, 10 de Gournay, Mlle., 39 Granville, 47 Graves, R., poetry of, 280-1 Gray, 89, 108 Greene, 32 Grenfell, J., poems of, 271-3 Guiana, Raleigh's "gold mine" in, 20

Halifax, Lord, 50 Handel, 80 Harcourt, Mrs., 57 Hardy, Thomas, lyrical poetry of, 233-58; independence of his career as a poet, 233-4; unity and consistence of his poetry, 234; sympathy with Swinburne, 235; historic development of lyrics, 236; novel writing interfering with, 237-8; place of poetry in his literary career, 238; "Wessex Ballads" and "Poems of Past and Present," 238-40; "The Dynasts" and "Times' Laughing Stocks," 240-2; "Satires of Circumstance," 242-3; "Moments of Vision," 243-4; technical quality of his poetry, 244; metrical forms, 245-6; pessimistic conception of life, 247-8; compared with Crabbe, 248; consolation found by, 249-51; compared with Wordsworth, 251; human sympathy, 251; range of subjects, 252-5; speculations on immortality, 256; "The Dynasts," 68, 257; unchangeableness of his art, 257-8; "Song of the Soldiers," 263 Hawthorne, 107 Hayley, 5 Hazlitt, 301 Henrietta Temple, by B. Disraeli, 153, 159 Heywood, songs of, 35 Higgons, Bevil, 43 Hobbes, 98 Hodgson, W.N., 284 Homer, 12 Hooker, 17 Hope, H.T., 164 Housman, A.E., 268 Hugo, V., 6, 12, 111, 134 Hume, 98 Hunt, Leigh, 104

Inglis, Dr., 51, 58 Ireland, Raleigh in, 23

James I, distrust and treatment of Raleigh, 19, 20, 21 James II, 42 Johnson, Dr., his opinion of the Wartons, 86, 98 Jowett, Dr., 320

Keats, Mrs. Carlyle's opinion of, 9; 5, 90, 104, 105 King, Peter, 53, 59 Kipling, R., poetry of, 300

Landon, Letitia, 131 Lansdowne, Lord, 191 Lauderdale, Earl of, 42 Lauderdale, Maitland, Duke of, 40, 41 Lawson, H., poems of, 284 Lee, 50 Leibnitz, 42, 54, 55, 56, 59 Lemaitre, J., 7 Lewis, "Monk," 162 Locke, Catharine Trotter's defence of, 53-5; death of, 55; 42 Lockhart, 135 Lodge, 32 Lothair, by B. Disraeli, 173-8 Love at a Loss, by Catharine Trotter, 51 Lowell, 108 Lucas, Lord, 274 Lyly, John, 31 Lytton, Bulwer-, see Bulwer-Lytton. Lytton, Lord, biography of Bulwer-Lytton, 117, 118-19, 120, 122, 129, 130, 131, 133, 137 Lytton, R., biography of Bulwer-Lytton, 118, 121

Macaulay, Lord, 320-1 Macpherson, 86 Malebranche, 52 Malherbe, 70, 77 Mallarme, 77, 106 Malory's Morte d'Arthur, 85 Manley, Mrs., 44, 45, 46, 61 Manning, Cardinal, Mr. Strachey's portrait of, 323, 330-2 Manoa, 19 Mant, 73 Marinetti, M., 305, 318 Marini, 78 Marlborough, Sarah, Duchess of, 57 Marlborough, Duke of, Catharine Trotter's poem of welcome to, 58 Marlowe, songs of, 34 Marsh, E., 261 Masham, Lady, 55, 56, 59 Massinger, 35 Melbourne, Lord, 131 Memories, by Lord Redesdale, 216, 217, 219, 221 Milton, influence upon eighteenth-century poetry, 79; 82, 110 Mitford, Major Hon. C, 218 Mockel, A., 112 Moments of Vision, by T. Hardy, 243-4 Monckton-Milnes, Sir R., 133 Morris, 104 Myers, F., 320

Nevill, Lady Dorothy, Open Letter to Lady Burghclere on, 181-96; memoirs of, 181-2; writer's friendship with, 152; appearance and physical strength, 183-4; characteristics, 184-5; a spectator of life, 186-7; attitude to the country, 187; wit, conversation and correspondence, 187-92; relation to literature and art, 192-4; emotional nature, 194-6 Nevill, Ralph, Memoirs of Lady D. Nevill by, 181-2 Newcastle, Margaret, Duchess of, 39 Nichols, R., poetry of, 276-80 Nietzsche, 219-20 Nightingale, Florence, Mr. Strachey's Life of, 324 Norris, John, 52, 53

Obermann, 76 Observations on the Faerie Queene, by T. Warton, 84-6 Ode on the Approach of Summer, by T. Warton, 79 Odes, by J. Warton, 69, 75, 80 Otway, 50

Panmure, Lord, 325-6 Paris, Gaston, 7, 8 Parnell, 76 Parr, Dr. S., 120 Pater, W., 71 Patmore, C., 237 Peacock, 104 Peele, 32 Peguy, C., 268 Pelham, by Sir E. Bulwer-Lytton, the author of, 117-37; 135, 155 Pepys, S., 27 Perth, 4th Earl of, 40, 42 Philip van Artevelde, by H. Taylor, 107 Piers, Lady, 50, 51 Piers, Sir G., 50 Pix, Mrs. Mary, 45, 46, 61 Poe, E.A., centenary of, address on, 103-13; importance as a poet ignored, 103; original want of recognition of, 104-5; his reaction to unfriendly criticism, 105-6; essential qualities of his genius, 106-7; contemporary conception of poetry, 107-8; his ideal of poetry, 108; influences upon, 108-9; early verses, poetic genius in, 109; melodiousness of, 110-11; symbolism of, 112-13 Poems and Ballads, by A.C. Swinburne, Bulwer-Lytton's support of, 133-4 Poems of Past and Present, by T. Hardy, 238-40 Pope, Romanticists' revolt against classicism of, 70-90; 68 Prussia, Sophia Charlotte, Queen of, 58

Rabelais, 90 Radcliffe, Mrs., 85, 162 Raleigh, North Carolina, foundation of, 25-6 Raleigh, W., junr., 20 Raleigh, Sir W., address delivered on Tercentenary celebration of, 15-27; patriotism and hatred of Spain, 15-17, 21-2; character, 18; adventurous nature, 18-19; James I and, 19-20; his El Dorado dreams, 20; fall and trial, 21; savage aspects of, 23; as a naval strategist, 23-4; genius as coloniser, 24-5; imprisonment and execution, 26-7 Ramsay, Allan, 70 Redesdale, Lord, last days of, 216-30; literary career, 216-7; vitality: pride in authorship and garden, 217-8; death of son, 218; "Memories," 219; loneliness and problem of occupying his time, 219-22; origin of last book, its theme, 222-4; last days, 224-30 Rene, 76 Rentoul, L., poems of, 284 Rette, A., 112 Reynolds, 104 Ritson, Joseph, attack upon T. Warton, 88-9 Roanoke, Virginia, British settlement in, 25 Roche, Lord and Lady, 23 Romanticism, Two Pioneers of, Joseph and Thomas Warton, address on, 65-90 Romantic movement, features of, 71-90 Rossetti, D.G., 104, 136 Rousseau, J.J., English Romanticists' relation to, 68, 68, 75 Ruskin, 100 Russell, Odo, 330

Sainte-Beuve, 6 Sappho, 84 Sassoon, S., poems of, 282-4 Satires of Circumstance, by T. Hardy, 242-3 Satow, Sir E., 223 Scott, Sir W., 108, 128, 135 Scudery, M. de, 39 Seaman, Sir G., war invective of, 264 Selbourne, Lord, 320 Selden, 98 Senancour, 74 Sentimental Journey, The, by L. Sterne, 96, 100 Seventeenth century, English women writers of, 39 Shakespeare, the Songs of, 31-5; their dramatic value, 31-3; lyrical qualities, 33-5; comparison with contemporary lyricists, 35; 17, 82 Shelley, 74, 104, 108, 162 Shenstone, 70 Shepherd of the Ocean, The, 15-27 Shorter, C., 141 Some Soldier Poets, 261-85; outbreak of war poetry, 262-3; mildness of British Hymns of Hate, 264-5; military influence upon poetic feeling, 265-6; tendency to dispense with form, 266; common literary influences, 267-8; Rupert Brooke, 268-70; J. Grenfell, 271-3; M. Baring, 273-5; N.M.F. Corbett, 275; E.W. Tennant, 275; R. Nichols, 276-80; R. Graves, 280-1; S. Sassoon, 282-4; C.H. Sorley, W.N. Hodgson, K. Lawson, L. Rentoul, R.E. Vernede, 284 Sorley, C.H., poems of, 284 Southey, 5, 104 Spain, Anglo-Spanish rivalry in days of Walter Raleigh, 16-17, 21-3, 24 Spenser, 17, 82, 84, 111 Stephen, Sir Leslie, 106, 237 Sterne, Laurence, Essay on the Charm of, 93-100; birth and childhood, 93-4; temperament, 94-5; intellectual development, 95-6; alternation of feeling about, 97; English literature's debt to, 98; his "indelicacy," 99; irrelevancy, 99; Shandean influences upon literature, 100 Sterne, Mrs., 93 Sterne, Roger, 93 Stevenson, R.L., 100 Strachey, Lytton, "Eminent Victorians" by, review of, 318-32 Stukeley, Sir L., 21 Sully-Prudhomme, fluctuations in taste as regards, 5-9 Sumners, Montagu, 39 Swinburne, A. C, Bulwer-Lytton and, 133-4; Hardy's sympathy with, 235; 68, 81, 111 Symbolism and poetry, 308-9

Tales of Old Japan, by Lord Redesdale, 216 Tancred, by B. Disraeli, 153 Taste, fluctuations in, 3-12; regarding Wordsworth, 3-4; Mr. Balfour's conclusions, 4-5, 10; volte-face concerning Sully-Prudhomme, 5-10 Tea-Table Miscellany, 70 Temple, Mrs., 45 Tennant, E.W., poetry of, 275 Tennyson, Victorian opinion of, 320-1; 7, 12, 81, 106, 116, 132, 299 Thackeray, 144 The Bamboo Garden, by Lord Redesdale, 216 The Bells, by E.A. Poe, 111 The Dynasts, by T. Hardy, 240, 257 The Enthusiast, by Joseph Warton, importance of, 69, 73 The Female Wits, by Catharine Trotter, 45-6 The Raven, by E.A. Poe, 108, 111 The Revolution in Sweden, by Catharine Trotter, 57-8 The Unhappy Penitent, by Catharine Trotter, 50-1 The Young Duke, by B. Disraeli, 153, 157 Thomson, James, 78, 307 Thomson's Castle of Indolence, 68 Times' Laughing Stocks, by T. Hardy, 240-2 Tottel's Miscellany, 261 Tristram Shandy, by L. Sterne, 94, 96, 98, 99, 100 Trotter, Capt. D., R.N., 40 Trotter, Catharine, 39-62; precocity, 39, 42; parentage, 40; poverty, 41-2; early verses, 43; correspondence with celebrated people, 43; Agnes de Castro, 43-5; The Female Wits, 45-6; Fatal Friendship, 47-9; elegy on Dryden's death, 49-50; The Unhappy Penitent, 50-1; Love at a Loss, 51; friendship with the Burnets, 52; philosophical studies, 42, 52-3; enthusiasm for Locke, 53, 55; The Revolution in Sweden, 54, 57; correspondence with Leibnitz, 55; indignation at aspersions on feminine intellectuality, 56-7; poem of welcome to Marlborough, 58; attachment to G. Burnet, 59-60; marriage with Mr. Cockburn, 60; later life, 60-1 Trotter, Mrs., poverty of, 41 Tupper, 5 Turkey Company, 40

Ulalume, by E.A. Poe, 103, 107, 109, 112 Upchear, Henry, 31

Veluvana, by Lord Redesdale, theme of, 222-4, 226 Venetia, by B. Disraeli, 163 Venice, its fascination for Disraeli, 163 Verbruggen, Mrs., 45 Verlaine, Paul, 7 Vernede, R.E., poems of, 284 de Verville, B., 95, 95, 96 Victorian Age, the Agony of, 313-37 Virgil, 12 Vivian Grey, by B. Disraeli, 155, 156, 157-9 Voltaire, 3, 162

Waller, 82 Warburton, Dr., 33, 81, 97 Ward, Mrs. Humphrey, 144, 327 Ward, Plumer, novels of, 155, 156, 178 Warton, Joseph and Thomas; Two Pioneers of Romanticism, address on, 65-90; parentage and early habits, 66-7; heralds of romantic movement, 67; literary contemporaries and atmosphere, 68; Joseph, the leading spirit, 68-9; The Enthusiast, its romantic qualities, 69; their revolt against principles of classic poetry, 70-4; characteristic features of early Romanticism, 74-9; Miltonic influence, 79-80; Essay on the Genius of Pope, 80-4; Observations on the Faerie Queene, 84-6; Johnson's criticism of, 86-7; Ritson's attack upon Thomas, 88; defects of, 89-90 Webster's White Devil, 34 Wessex Ballads, by T. Hardy, 238-40 Wheeler, R.D. (Lady Lytton), Miss Devey's Life of, 121; story of marriage with Bulwer-Lytton, 121-9 Whitehead, 74 William III, 41 Willis, N.P., 105 Wilson, Harriette, 130-1 Wolseley, Lord, 328 Wooler, Miss, 141, 142, 143 Wordsworth, Hardy compared with, 251; speculations concerning future poetry, 298-9; 3, 4, 10, 74, 78, 90, 104, 107, 108, 110, 253 Wycherley, 44

Yeats, 70 Young, 68, 69, 81

PRINTED IN GREAT BRITAIN BY RICHARD CLAY & SONS, LIMITED BRUNSWICK ST., STAMFORD ST., S.E. 1, AND BUNGAY, SUFFOLK.

THE END

Previous Part     1  2  3  4  5  6  7
Home - Random Browse